Amd Radeon Pro Wx 5100 Review

April xxx, 2018 Addendum: Updated operation tin can be plant here.

2017 might have only begun, but information technology's a secret to no ane that AMD has a massive twelvemonth planned, 1 that could be integral to its future success.

Its Vega-based Radeon GPUs are expected to launch in the next couple of months, and the same applies to its hugely anticipated Ryzen processors. And, lest nosotros forget AMD'due south workstation focus: Radeon Pros will be an important function of AMD's 2017, as well.

When AMD announced its Radeon Pro serial last summer, you could almost hear the collective sigh of relief. Leading up to that signal, many had wondered exactly what was going to happen with AMD's FirePro line, as revolutionary releases were nowhere to be seen. With Radeon Pro, AMD ushered in a proper successor to FirePro, complementing its recharged focus.

A major new release for AMD's workstation graphics is notable enough, simply what makes all three of these new models stand out is their affordability. If you can't shell out $2,000+ for a workstation carte, AMD has got you covered with its $799 WX 7100, sporting 8GB of VRAM. At the bottom is the $399 WX 4100, a depression-contour offering. The middle slot belongs to the $499 WX 5100, which like the WX 4100, doesn't require a ability connector.

We'll be taking an in-depth look at the WX 7100 presently, simply for this commodity, the focus volition be on the lesser rungs: WX 5100 and WX 4100.

AMD Radeon Pro Serial	Performance	Clock	Cores	Memory	Length	Power
WX 7100	5.7 TFLOPs	1243MHz	2304	8192MB	9.five″	<130W
WX 5100	3.9 TFLOPs	1086MHz	1792	8192MB	6.8″	<75W
WX 4100	two.4 TFLOPs	1201MHz	1024	4096MB	6.6″ (LP)	<50W

Considering the small differences in price, and differences in performance, the Radeon Pro WX 5100 stands to be the most popular selection of these 3 for virtually users, although equally I'chiliad not a psychic, I could be a footling off. 1 matter's for sure: you stand to proceeds a lot when moving from the WX 4100 to WX 7100. It's double the cost, but it'due south more than twice the functioning. You don't see that kind of operation / cost gain too often in the workstation market.

That said, AMD squarely targets each i of these three GPUs at a slightly dissimilar market, and so if you lot're not sure which ane best-suits yous, you should have no questions left in a moment:

The WX 4100 is excellent for CAD work, with AMD even going as far every bit to call it "Best in Course" for that purpose. You should have no performance hassles whatever when designing your CAD environments.

The WX 5100 is suited for those who plan to do a off-white amount of rendering. Nosotros're not talking full-blown scenes here, but rather rendering of simpler scenes or perhaps of a complex object without a scene (sculpting would exist a good instance). As you'd expect with a GPU right in the middle of the other ii, the WX 5100 is ideal for those who want better performance than what the WX 4100 tin can provide without going over $500.

The WX 7100 is the big gun, the one designed for all sorts of rendering, including VR. In fact, AMD calls this an ideal GPU for VR content development, equally its gaming prowess is plenty to allow the designers test out their own content. Both the creation and playback performance on this carte du jour will be more than sufficient for most customers. For those with heavier needs, multiple WX 7100s could be installed in the aforementioned workstation (up to 4 – providing 20 TFLOPS+ functioning for $3,200).

One thing worth noting is that while gaming is non the big focus of AMD's Radeon Pro line, the functioning you meet on each card should be similar to one of the company'south gaming-focused Radeon RX line. The WX 7100, for example, is similar in design to the RX 480, but it has one cool play a joke on under its sleeves: it'due south single-slot.

That said, if gaming is an important characteristic of your workstation menu, you'll definitely desire to opt for the WX 7100 for the best overall performance. Information technology can handle 1080p games with ease, and 1440p with some settings tweaks.

On the topic of gaming, one excellent feature AMD ported over from its Radeon commuter is ReLive, a software solution that takes reward of GPU horsepower to record your display with minimal bear on. While recording gameplay is an obvious employ of this tool, AMD notes that it's also ideal for recording video for afterwards use in grooming. Or, if you're as forgetful as I am, it'due south also a good way to record a certain workflow for future reference.

Earlier jumping into the performance information, it needs to be mentioned that AMD offers two dissimilar Radeon Pro drivers for customers to choose from. The "Enterprise" version is the hardened version, designed for those who don't plan to upgrade more than than one time per three months, and aim to make their environment every bit stable as possible. While the other driver, "Scarlet ReLive", is undoubtedly stable, information technology'south not likely to meet most corporate guidelines for production drivers.

If you have a say in which driver you can utilize, you'd desire to opt for Red, equally it will ever offering the cutting-border functioning enhancements. Fortunately, the just-released 17.Q1 Enterprise commuter simply added ReLive, so enterprise users can savour information technology, too.

Testing The Radeon Pro WX 5100 & WX 4100

On the following pages, we'll be putting AMD'south Radeon Pro WX 5100 and WX 4100 through a gauntlet of real-earth and constructed tests, utilizing apps from Autodesk, Adobe, SPEC, SiSoftware, and a handful of others (including light gaming tests for proficient measure out).

All tests are run at to the lowest degree twice to produce an accurate consequence, and if for some reason an odd effect creeps upwards, nosotros do a tertiary run. In the case of this particular review, no tests had to go that route, as most of the benchmarks are very good at delivering similar results with each repeated run.

Our Windows 7 Ultimate x64 exam Os has a couple of cardinal Windows services disabled (Search, Defender, Firewall, and Update), as well as Aero. During all testing, the display is kept in 4K resolution, with two exceptions: SPECapc Maya 2012 and SPECviewperf are run with a 1080p resolution. Further, Vsync, Yard-SYNC, and FreeSync are disabled.

Our test organization is every bit follows:

	Techgage Workstation Examination System
Processor	Intel Core i7-5960X (8-cadre; 3GHz)
Motherboard	ASUS X99-Palatial
Retention	Corsair Vengeance 32GB (8x4GB; DDR3-2133 eleven-12-xi)
Graphics	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 12GB (GeForce 353.xxx) NVIDIA Quadro M6000 12GB (Quadro 352.86) NVIDIA Quadro M2000 4GB (Quadro 362.13) NVIDIA Quadro K5200 8GB (Quadro 353.30) NVIDIA Quadro K5000 4GB (Quadro 353.xxx) AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 8GB (16.12.one) AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 4GB (16.12.ane) AMD FirePro W4300 4GB (FirePro 15.201)
Sound	Onboard
Storage	Kingston HyperX 3K 480GB SSD
Power Supply	Cooler Master Silent Pro Hybrid 1300W
Chassis	Cooler Principal Tempest Trooper
Cooling	Thermaltake WATER3.0 Extreme Liquid
Displays	Acer XB280HK 28″ 4K G-SYNC Monitor
Et cetera	Windows 7 Professional 64-bit

With that all covered, information technology's time to jump into the test results.

Support our efforts! With advertising revenue at an all-time low for written websites, we're relying more than ever on reader support to help united states of america continue putting so much endeavour into this type of content. Y'all can back up united states by becoming a Patron, or by using our Amazon shopping affiliate links listed through our articles. Thank you for your back up!

Source: https://techgage.com/article/amd-radeon-pro-wx-5100-wx-4100-workstation-gpu-review/

Share this post